<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/tag/insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laconiclawblog.com</link>
	<description>Pithy Commentary On Employment Law In Virginia And Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Split Arises In Virginia On Employer Liability Insurance Exclusion</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/06/17/split-arises-in-virginia-on-employer-liability-insurance-exclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/06/17/split-arises-in-virginia-on-employer-liability-insurance-exclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Welter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPLI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia holding that a business insurance carrier must defend an employer after a workplace shooting leads to a negligence action by the employee&#8217;s estate (see article here), a &#8230; <a href="http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/06/17/split-arises-in-virginia-on-employer-liability-insurance-exclusion/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">After a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia holding that a business insurance carrier must defend an employer after a workplace shooting leads to a negligence action by the employee&#8217;s estate (see article <a title="Click here for article" href="http://www.valawyersweekly.com/weeklyedition/2009/06/15/cgl-carrier-must-defend-workplace-shooting-suit/" target="_blank">here</a>), a split has arisen between the Eastern and Western Districts.  According to the article, a decision from the Western District reaching the opposite conclusion is on appeal to the 4th Circuit.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Although this was not an EPLI case, it is a good reminder to employers to check for any applicable insurance coverage after any workplace &#8220;claim&#8221; arises.  If there is an arguable basis for coverage, the employer should place the carrier on notice of the claim to protect its rights under the policy.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Split+Arises+In+Virginia+On+Employer+Liability+Insurance+Exclusion+http%3A%2F%2Flaconiclawblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D432" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://laconiclawblog.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/06/17/split-arises-in-virginia-on-employer-liability-insurance-exclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

