http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/10/12/the-most-oppressive-motion-ever-presented-to-a-superior-court/ Pithy Commentary On Employment Law In Virginia And Beyond Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:56:15 -0500 hourly 1 http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/10/12/the-most-oppressive-motion-ever-presented-to-a-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-16836 Norman Solberg Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:34:53 +0000 http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=470#comment-16836 As a former Fortune 500 General Counsel myself (long ago), I cannot understand the lapse in oversight by the UA legal department in allowing such work to be done by the Littler firm. Out of control and extremely counter-productive. There's a fee that should be slashed. As a former Fortune 500 General Counsel myself (long ago), I cannot understand the lapse in oversight by the UA legal department in allowing such work to be done by the Littler firm. Out of control and extremely counter-productive. There’s a fee that should be slashed.

]]> http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/10/12/the-most-oppressive-motion-ever-presented-to-a-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-16806 Mike Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:00:41 +0000 http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=470#comment-16806 1150 pages! Amazing. On its face, that does not appear to be the counseling and problem solving for which attorneys should be retained. Knowing that the judge has to read through that run on objection just as closely as opposing counsel, how could the attorney not think he/she would not be reprimanded. 1150 pages! Amazing. On its face, that does not appear to be the counseling and problem solving for which attorneys should be retained. Knowing that the judge has to read through that run on objection just as closely as opposing counsel, how could the attorney not think he/she would not be reprimanded.

]]>